Using Two Patient Identifiers in the Pharmacy for Safety: How It Prevents Medication Errors

Using Two Patient Identifiers in the Pharmacy for Safety: How It Prevents Medication Errors

Every year, thousands of patients in the U.S. get the wrong medication-not because a pharmacist made a careless mistake, but because someone was misidentified. A man named John Smith gets his blood pressure pill. Another John Smith, with the same birthday and same last name, gets the wrong one. That’s not hypothetical. That’s happening in pharmacies right now. The fix isn’t fancy. It’s simple: use two patient identifiers every single time you hand out a prescription.

Why Two Identifiers? It’s Not Just a Rule-It’s a Lifesaver

The Joint Commission made this a national patient safety goal back in 2003. They didn’t do it because they liked paperwork. They did it because people were dying. A 2020 study in JMIR Medical Informatics found that up to 10% of serious drug interaction alerts go unnoticed-not because the system failed, but because the patient’s identity wasn’t confirmed correctly. That means someone with a known allergy to penicillin could get it. Someone on blood thinners could get a new drug that turns their blood to water. These aren’t rare mistakes. They’re preventable ones.

Using two identifiers means you don’t rely on just a name. You don’t rely on a room number. You don’t rely on a guess. You use two things that belong only to that person: their full legal name and date of birth. Or their name and medical record number. Or their name and phone number. Anything that ties directly to them. Room number? Not valid. Hospital wing? Not valid. Even if the nurse says, “He’s in 304,” that’s not enough. It’s not about convenience. It’s about making sure the right person gets the right pill.

Manual Checks Alone Aren’t Enough

You might think, “I ask for their name and DOB. That’s enough.” But human memory is messy. Staff are tired. Patients get confused. One pharmacist in Calgary told me, “I’ve had patients say, ‘I’m 42,’ when they’re 52. I didn’t catch it because I was rushing.” That’s not negligence-it’s systemic pressure.

A 2023 survey by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists found that 63% of pharmacists admit to occasionally skipping full verification during peak hours. Why? Because it takes time. But here’s the truth: skipping verification doesn’t save time-it costs more. One wrong medication can mean an ER visit, a hospital stay, a lawsuit. The cost of a single error? Often over $20,000. The cost of a death? Unmeasurable.

Technology Makes It Work

Barcode scanning changed everything. When a pharmacist scans the patient’s wristband and the medication’s barcode, the system checks: Is this the right drug? Is this the right patient? Is this the right dose? Is this the right time? All in two seconds.

A 2012 study in the Journal of Patient Safety showed that after hospitals started using barcode systems, medication errors reaching patients dropped by 75%. That’s not a small number. That’s thousands of lives saved every year. Biometric systems like palm-vein scanners-used in some hospitals-have a 94% accuracy rate. Compare that to hospitals without them: only 17% accuracy in matching patients to records. That’s not a tech upgrade. That’s a safety revolution.

Even small pharmacies can use low-cost solutions. Many pharmacy software systems now let you scan a QR code on the patient’s insurance card to pull up their record. No need for wristbands. No need for expensive hardware. Just a phone or tablet. If your pharmacy doesn’t have this, ask why.

Two pharmacy workers verifying ID as ghostly misidentified patients fade away, with duplicate records crumbling in the background.

What Happens When You Don’t Use Two Identifiers?

Let’s look at a real case. A man was transferred from an out-of-town ER to a Calgary hospital. He was unconscious. The admitting staff couldn’t find his record. So they created a new one. Days later, they realized he already had a record-but under his middle name, not his first. That old record listed a life-threatening allergy to sulfa drugs. The new record didn’t. He got a sulfa-based antibiotic. He went into anaphylaxis. He survived. But he didn’t have to.

This isn’t an outlier. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT says 8-12% of patient records in hospitals without good identification systems are duplicates. That means one person might have three or four medical files. One for each doctor. One for each hospital visit. Each with different allergies, different meds, different diagnoses. It’s chaos. And pharmacies are on the front lines.

Why Double Checking Doesn’t Always Work

Some pharmacies try to fix errors by having two staff members verify the prescription. “Two heads are better than one,” they say. But a 2020 review in BMJ Quality & Safety found no solid proof that this reduces errors. Why? Because both people often check the same screen, read the same name, and miss the same mistake. It’s not independent verification-it’s groupthink.

The real fix isn’t more people. It’s better systems. One person using two identifiers with a barcode scanner is safer than two people guessing from memory.

QR code scanned by skeletal tablet connecting to a glowing patient profile, while a 'Room 304' shadow dissolves into smoke.

Implementation Isn’t Hard-It Just Takes Discipline

You don’t need a million-dollar IT project. Start small. Pick one area: the high-alert meds. Warfarin. Insulin. Opioids. Make sure every single one gets verified with two identifiers and documented. Then expand.

Training matters. Don’t just hand out a policy. Show videos. Role-play scenarios. Let staff practice with fake patients. Ask them: “What if the patient says their birthday is wrong? What do you do?”

Document everything. The Joint Commission found that 37% of non-compliant pharmacies didn’t even record the verification. If you didn’t write it down, it didn’t happen. That’s not just bad practice-it’s a liability.

What’s Next? The Future of Patient ID

In January 2025, a pilot program launched in five U.S. health networks to test a universal patient identifier. It’s not a Social Security number. It’s not a driver’s license. It’s a unique, encrypted code tied to the person-not the system. If it works, it could eliminate duplicate records forever.

But you don’t have to wait. Right now, you can do something that will save lives:

  • Use two identifiers on every prescription-no exceptions.
  • Use barcode scanning if you have it.
  • Don’t accept room numbers, locations, or nicknames.
  • Document every verification.
  • Train new staff on day one.

Final Thought: This Isn’t About Compliance. It’s About Care.

The Joint Commission doesn’t care if you check off a box. The patient doesn’t care if you followed protocol. They care if they got the right pill. If they lived. If they didn’t end up in the ER because someone skipped a step.

In pharmacy, you’re not just dispensing medicine. You’re holding someone’s life in your hands. Two identifiers isn’t a rule. It’s your promise.

Cyrus McAllister
Cyrus McAllister

My name is Cyrus McAllister, and I am an expert in the field of pharmaceuticals. I have dedicated my career to researching and developing innovative medications for various diseases. My passion for this field has led me to write extensively about medications and their impacts on patients' lives, as well as exploring new treatment options for various illnesses. I constantly strive to deepen my knowledge and stay updated on the latest advancements in the industry. Sharing my findings and insights with others is my way of contributing to the betterment of global health.

View all posts by: Cyrus McAllister

RESPONSES

Bruno Janssen
Bruno Janssen

Been there. Saw a guy get metformin instead of lisinopril because the tech just went by the name. Guy ended up in the ER with a BP of 210/120. No one apologized. Just shrugged and said, "We were busy."
Now I scan everything. Even if it takes 10 extra seconds. Lives over paperwork.

  • December 13, 2025
Scott Butler
Scott Butler

Of course this is a problem. We let bureaucrats write safety rules instead of letting real pharmacists do their jobs. Why not just make everyone get a government ID chip? Then we wouldn’t have this nonsense.
Stop pretending scanning barcodes is innovation. It’s just compliance theater.

  • December 14, 2025
Emma Sbarge
Emma Sbarge

My aunt got the wrong anticoagulant because they used her nickname, "Jenny," and there were two Jennys in the system. She had a stroke. The pharmacy blamed her for not correcting them.
They didn’t even document the verification. That’s not just negligence. That’s criminal.

  • December 15, 2025
Deborah Andrich
Deborah Andrich

I’ve worked in three different hospitals and every single one had this problem. Not because people are lazy. Because they’re overwhelmed.
But here’s the thing: if you make it part of your rhythm, it becomes second nature. Like washing your hands. You don’t think about it. You just do it.
Start with one med. One shift. One person. Change ripples.
And yes - if a patient says their DOB is wrong, you stop. You verify with the chart. You call the clinic. You don’t guess. Not ever.

  • December 16, 2025
sharon soila
sharon soila

Every human being deserves to be correctly identified before receiving medicine. This is not a suggestion. This is a moral duty.
When you hold a pill in your hand, you are holding someone’s future. One mistake. One skipped step. One rushed moment. And it’s over.
Let’s treat this like the sacred act it is.

  • December 17, 2025
nina nakamura
nina nakamura

Anyone who thinks scanning barcodes is "expensive" hasn’t done the math. One death costs $3 million in legal fees alone. A scanner is $200.
And no, having two people check doesn’t work. I’ve seen it. Both people read the same screen, miss the same typo, and move on. It’s not safety. It’s a performance.
Stop pretending you’re doing better because you have more bodies. Use tech. Use two identifiers. Document it. Or get out of the business.

  • December 18, 2025
Constantine Vigderman
Constantine Vigderman

OMG YES!!!
Just had a coworker almost give insulin to a patient with a 42-year-old DOB when he was actually 52. I caught it because I asked for the insurance card and scanned it. He was so mad at me for "making him wait."
Bro... he could’ve died. And now I’m the bad guy? 😭
Scan. Scan. Scan. Even if they roll their eyes. Even if they say "I’m right here."
Scan. 🙏

  • December 19, 2025
Cole Newman
Cole Newman

Why do we even have this rule? Why not just train people better? You know what’s worse than scanning? Scanning and still getting it wrong because the barcode’s smudged.
Real talk - I’ve seen people scan the wrong barcode and still say "verified."
It’s not the tool. It’s the people. Fix the people.
Also, why are we still using paper charts in 2025?

  • December 21, 2025
Tyrone Marshall
Tyrone Marshall

I used to think this was overkill. Then I saw a 78-year-old woman get a double dose of warfarin because the nurse said, "She’s in bed 4, the one with the purple blanket."
She bled internally. Lived. But now she’s on oxygen.
Two identifiers isn’t bureaucracy. It’s the bare minimum of human decency.
And if your pharmacy doesn’t have a barcode scanner? Get one. Or at least make sure every single script gets verified with name + DOB - written down, not said aloud.
Write it down. That’s the rule. Not the scanner. The writing.

  • December 22, 2025
kevin moranga
kevin moranga

Let me tell you about my first week as a pharmacy tech. I thought I was being efficient by asking for name and DOB while I was filling the script.
Then my preceptor pulled me aside and said, "You don’t ask for ID while you’re busy. You stop everything. You look them in the eye. You say, ‘Can I confirm your full name and birthdate?’ And you wait. Not just for the answer - for the moment they realize you care enough to pause."
That changed everything.
Now I do it for every single person. Even the ones who say, "You don’t need to ask me again, I’m here every Tuesday."
Yes I do. Because Tuesday’s not today.
And today’s the day someone might die because you didn’t pause.

  • December 23, 2025
Tommy Watson
Tommy Watson

So what? People are dumb. They give wrong birthdays. They forget their middle names. It’s not the pharmacy’s fault.
Why are we spending millions on scanners when we could just tell patients to know their own damn info?
Also, I’m pretty sure the guy in the story was just lazy and didn’t tell them his middle name. That’s on him.
Stop blaming the system. Blame the people.

  • December 24, 2025
Donna Hammond
Donna Hammond

Correct patient identification isn’t a policy. It’s a practice. And like any practice, it requires consistency, documentation, and accountability.
The Joint Commission doesn’t care about your intentions. They care about your records.
If you didn’t document it, it didn’t happen. And if it didn’t happen, you’re liable.
Barcodes, QR codes, biometrics - they’re tools. But the real tool is the discipline to stop, verify, and write it down. Every time. No exceptions.
This isn’t about technology. It’s about integrity.

  • December 25, 2025
Willie Onst
Willie Onst

My dad’s a retired pharmacist. He told me: "Back in the day, we used to call the doctor’s office to confirm. We’d write the name on a sticky note and put it on the bottle. We didn’t need scanners. We just cared."
Now we scan, but we don’t look up.
Maybe the problem isn’t the system. Maybe it’s that we stopped caring.
Let’s start looking people in the eye again.
And maybe - just maybe - we’ll stop killing them by accident.

  • December 27, 2025

Write a comment

RECENT POSTS

September 30, 2025
Aromasin (Exemestane) vs. Other Breast Cancer Drugs: Detailed Comparison

A practical, side‑by‑side comparison of Aromasin (exemestane) with letrozole, anastrozole, and tamoxifen, covering mechanisms, side effects, cost, and choosing the right drug.

January 3, 2025
Top Alternatives to WebMD: Explore Trusted Health Information Sources

Discover a variety of alternatives to WebMD for reliable health information. From government-backed resources like MedlinePlus and the CDC to user-friendly sites like Verywell Health, these options offer comprehensive insights into diseases, conditions, and wellness topics. Each alternative is rated based on its reliability, user experience, and breadth of information, helping users find the right fit for their health inquiries.

July 2, 2025
Prometrium Uses, Benefits, and Side Effects: What to Know

Learn all about Prometrium, its uses, benefits, side effects, and practical tips for real-life hormone therapy. Everything you need in one place.

November 1, 2025
Compare Anafranil (Clomipramine) with Alternatives for OCD and Depression

Anafranil (clomipramine) is effective for OCD but has tough side effects. Discover how SSRIs like Zoloft and Prozac compare as safer, nearly as effective alternatives - and when Anafranil might still be the best choice.

November 22, 2025
Choosing Diabetes Medications Based on Side Effect Profiles: A Practical Guide for Patients and Providers

Learn how to choose diabetes medications based on side effect profiles to improve adherence, avoid dangerous reactions, and match treatment to your health goals-without sacrificing blood sugar control.